>Sept 6, 2008
>ok...i don't want to be a pesker...yet am i hearing that doing the xxxx xxxx to >oneself is often "useless"...for lack of a better term?! if one is "new" or has >that lousy calibration issue, is there something else to suggest?! and are drills >x,y and z, the five minute routine? perhaps i should just wait for more info from >someone else yet i'm addicted to these discussions and seem to find questions >instigated by many of your discourses!! that's good in my book...hope it's good in >yours too!? :}
Hi Kris,
Learn from someone good.
Do the drills.
Calibrate.
Do more drills.
Calibrate.
Pretty soon you'll be right 80% (or more of the time) which is much more successful than almost all other methods.
In fact something called the Reactionary Sequence does have the 6 general steps there (not gone over in this post).
But I'm thinking that you might be upset because we all screw-up drastically when we learn something new and different.
Don't be.
It's a learning process we all go through, even those that seem to be competent and confident all of the time.
Just realize that we all need to learn and there is only one way to do it; by knowing what we want to know, find a trainer, do the drills, and get feedback on the drill until we can do it as a successful habit.
According to some performance research, Normal time to get some simple skill down to the level of unconscious competence is 2,000 to 3,000 times.
And thats the least level of competency you want, right?
There are 5 levels of competency.
I suggest you have fun doing it because it does take a while.
And I wish there was a magic pill, the red pill or the blue pill, you choose...but there isn't.
There is only practice and calibration. Then really neat things happen. What is great is that we have Donna and all the others who now also have competency that we can model, and by modeling their success we can gain their success.
Isn't it a wonderful world?
John M. La Tourrette,PhD
PS I still remember those double blind energy tests that we did back in Jupiter Beach about 10-11 years ago. I was reversed on all 18 of them. So taking the reversal into account I was 100% accurate. That's when I learned the importance of getting the proper 'waking trance' of Energy Testing. That's when I also devised ways from NLP to increase my intention, attention and accuracy of modeling good Energy Testers.
